A couple of years ago, Scot McKnight wrote on his blog, Jesus Creed, about zealotry. I was struck by his definition so much that I cut and pasted it for safe keeping!
Zealotry is conscious zeal to be radically committed, so radically committed that one goes beyond the Bible to defend things that are not in the Bible.
Often times, you hear the adage that it’s the hypocrites that keep people away from the church. Maybe so, but the zealots do a pretty good job, too, because so often “zeal” is accompanied by it’s ugly sister, “immunity.” Zealots think they are immune to criticism because they are so zealous for God. Their zeal never to get close to breaking any commandment makes them better than others. In other words, zeal shows just how deeply committed a person is to God and therefore immune to criticism. What, they reason to themselves, is wrong with doing more than the Bible? Does not God recognize our zeal?
This is an old religious tactic. Ancient Jewish rabbis called this “making a fence around the Torah.”
Example: the Torah says not to work on the Sabbath. So, let’s specify every kind of “work,” the zealots say. They come up with 40 or so kinds of labors that are “work.” These various kinds of works are the “fence” and the Sabbath command is the Torah. If one does not do such “work” a person does not violate the Sabbath working law. The idea is “add, add, add” and “clarify, clarify, clarify” and if you follow the “additions” and the “clarifications” you’ll not break the Torah’s commandment, which is always more general, always less specific, always open to interpretation.
Is the practice of making a fence around the Torah a trust that the Bible is wise? I think not. Making fences around the Torah suggests God needs our help to make his will a little clearer.
Zealotry is the theory, never expressed consciously, that if we are more zealous than the Bible we are immune from criticism. After all, we’ve done at the least what the Bible says and more!
I think religious people today do lots of “fence making.”
One example: the Bible says don’t get drunk. The conservative Christian fence is “don’t ever drink alcohol.” The problem is this: quickly, the “fence” becomes the “Torah” and drinking alcohol in moderation is no longer good enough. Anyone who crosses the zealot’s fence has broken the law.
Zealotry commits to the fence and in so doing goes beyond the Bible. Commitment to keeping the fence is a sign of radical commitment. It gives immunity. It ends up being no longer biblical but lets something else be “biblical.” Is this what God wants?
Nope. Zealotry through fence-making is a failure to trust what the Bible does say; it is a trust in what the Bible does not say; and it ends up snubbing God’s good Word which Christians believe is sufficient.
Let’s start being more biblical in our lives, relying less on a “new law,” and more on the living, dynamic guidance of God’s Spirit in the community of faith.
Previous post: Who Am I? Why Am I Here?
Next post: Gospel in 10 Words or Less
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
I enjoyed this post a great deal Wayne, and I’ve actually been reflecting on similar lines of thought over the past few months. I feel like sometimes this “zealotry” is what causes us to be “bound in tradition” and in turn removes the dynamic element and the idea of a Church that adapts to its environment. I also feel that some of these nonsense traditions – formed from our zealous approach to Christianity and desire of immunity in the eyes of criticism – cause us to feel safe and secure too often, simply because we feel as if we are going beyond the call of duty. I’m not sure when we reached the point that we thought it acceptable to rewrite and amend the Bible ourselves.
Great post – going to retweet it for others to enjoy! =)
-Chase
Thanks for your comments, Chase. Your connecting zealotry and (binding) tradition really moves the conversation forward in a helpful way. When religious people choose to create a “fence,” i.e., tea-totaling, no playing cards, dresses only for women, etc., we often find our identity in the fence issue. We’re set apart as different from the world because of some action or prohibition. But, if those actions are outside the great commandment of Jesus (love God/love others), we’re creating our OWN religion/morality. And any created system like that needs “tradition” to prop it up over time.
Understanding and believing that zealotry indeed creates fences around Christianity that God never intended or requires, I am curious about personal convictions?? For instance, there are those who are personally convicted about consuming alcohol or about listening to secular music. Does this border on zealotry? We are not limited from these things according to the Bible, but I believe that Christ can call you personally to be different, and not require others to do the same for personal growth or for purpose of reaching others for Christ (so as not to be a stumbling block). An example I see for this in Scripture is when Paul and Tim\othy are preaching among the Jews and Gentiles. Timothy was circumcised though he was not bound by the law to do so, simply because the Jews they were going to reach would find his uncircumcision to be a problem (Acts 16). Where does personal conviction become zealotry? Is the line a fine one?? I agree wholeheartedly that many zealots give Christianity a “religiousity” fence that God does not require to be put up. I too have encoutered to many people that have been turned-off of Christ by those who claim that Christianity means you have to abstain from “this” or “that” or do “this” or do “that.” The evil one prowls seeking out those who he can turn away from Christ any way he can, and often it is through zealots that he wins too many battles. Thank you Wayne for your words that inspire me to search Scriptures.
You bring up a good and needed distinction, Crystal. Fences and personal convictions …
There’s a part of me that wants to ask: why would we feel a “conviction” to do something outside the command of Jesus (love God/love others)? It can get pretty dangerous to say, “We are not limited from these things according to the Bible, but I believe that Christ can call you personally to be different…” I know it’s not where you’re going, but this is at the heart of many cults and other groups who start within the church.
There’s also a big part of me that agrees with what you’re suggesting. I think there is a line between personal conviction and zealotry. If, for example, we were convicted to abstain from dancing because it would limit our witness among a certain kind of people, then it is, I think, very consistent with Jesus’ command to love them by not making an issue out of it (though our freedom in Christ would permit us to dance).
I think in instances like this, or abstaining from alcohol, or any number of other issues, to realize that we are, indeed, acting out of personal conviction. Pray and seek others’ confirmation that this personal conviction is consistent with biblical teaching. And finally, be aware of the danger of turning the “fence” we’ve set for ourselves or our family into a “new law.”
Jesus didn’t seems to like what “religion” had become.
Rules are not what saves. Love (Grace) is what saves.
Rule 1. Love your God
Rule 2. Love your Neighbor
Class Dismissed….